Lower “Jumbo” Loan Limits Coming Soon

People buying homes in the country’s most expensive housing markets likely will face pricier mortgages starting in the fall.That’s when the current conforming mortgage limits are scheduled to expire, with limits for the most expensive markets falling to $625,500 from $729,750 in the contiguous U.S. On Friday, however, two lawmakers introduced a bill in the House that would retain the higher limits for two years.

Mortgages over the conforming limit are considered jumbo loans, and can’t be purchased and securitized by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. As such, they carry higher rates. The limits apply to both first mortgages and refinancing.

Limits vary by market, and the lower limits are equal to 115% of the median single-family home price, ranging from $417,000 to as much as $625,500.

“The fact that the limits are changing is going to raise the cost of home ownership for homes priced in that range between the old and the new limit,” says Greg McBride, senior financial analyst for Bankrate.com. While the change is expected to officially take effect Oct. 1, it may be reflected in loan quotes as early as the end of July, he says.

[pullquote_left]“If you’re looking at buying a house for $875,000, putting 20% down and taking a $700,000 loan, a couple of months from now it will come at a higher interest rate and you will have to put more money down,” in some high-cost markets, Mr. McBride says.[/pullquote_left]Now, if you’re sitting in Chicago, this doesn’t mean much to you because the limit in that area will remain $417,000. But in high-cost ZIP Codes, including Washington, D.C., New York and San Francisco, mortgages will get more expensive.

The loan-limit reduction would affect 250 counties in the country, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency. That’s just 8% of the counties in the U.S., according to Capital Economics, an economic analysis firm.

But many of those areas are highly populated. “About 60% of the U.S. population lives in a market where either the conforming loan limit or the FHA loan limit will be declining,” Mr. McBride says. The Federal Housing Administration also has loan limits for the loans it will insure, and those will be changing in the fall as well.

A few years ago, the difference in interest rates between a jumbo and conforming mortgage was much greater. Today, borrowers can expect a spread of between one-half to three-quarters of a percentage point between a conforming and jumbo mortgage, says Robert Van Order, professor of finance and chairman of George Washington University’s Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis.

On July 12, rates on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage for $200,000 in California were about 4.5%, according to Bank of America‘s website. For a 30-year jumbo mortgage of $750,000, rates were at 5%. Rates on a seven-year adjustable-rate mortgage for $750,000 in California were 3.75%, while a five-year ARM for that amount was 3.375%, according to Bank of America.

Because fixed-rate mortgages will be somewhat higher for jumbo borrowers, “more people will take out these adjustable-rate mortgages,” says Mr. Van Order. “But it’s not like [jumbo] mortgages won’t be available,” he adds. In fact, more lenders have been making jumbo loans in the past couple of years.

“Large banks will take advantage of their portfolios to lend in this environment,” says Matt Vernon, who heads up Bank of America’s retail mortgage division. “From a credit-availability perspective, the large banks that have portfolios allow for customers to continue to buy homes in this space.” (“Portfolio lending” refers to when banks make loans and hold them on their books, as opposed to securitizing them.)

But just because the money is available doesn’t mean it will be easy to get.

Often, lenders require jumbo borrowers to have a FICO score of at least 760, according to Capital Economics. A score of 720 is often needed to qualify for a conforming mortgage, it says.

Also, jumbo borrowers often have to come up with bigger down payments, possibly as much as 30%, says Mr. McBride. A 35% down payment for a jumbo mortgage isn’t unheard of either, says Scott Sheldon, a loan officer with Sonoma County Mortgages, in Petaluma, Calif.[pullquote_right]“Some people are blowing it off like it’s not a big deal,” Mr. Sheldon says of the loan-limit changes on the way. He says in markets like his, there will be a negative effect.[/pullquote_right]

“Some people are blowing it off like it’s not a big deal,” Mr. Sheldon says of the loan-limit changes on the way. He says in markets like his, there will be a negative effect.

“It’s going to price people out of the market,” he says, especially those looking for a competitively priced 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage above the loan limit. Most 30-year, fixed-rate jumbo mortgage quotes he is seeing lately have rates of nearly 6%.

But the higher loan limits were always considered temporary, and were never intended to be a permanent fix, Mr. Vernon says.

“If you’re looking at buying a house for $875,000, putting 20% down and taking a $700,000 loan, a couple of months from now it will come at a higher interest rate and you will have to put more money down,” in some high-cost markets, Mr. McBride says.

That’s not enough to cause borrowers to rush into a home purchase before they’re ready, he says. But for those looking to refinance in areas where the limits are dropping, Mr. McBride says, the time to take action is now.

SOURCE: Wall Street Journal

 

PMI to pay underwater borrowers to stay put

WALNUT CREEK, Calif., July 11, 2011

The PMI Group, Inc. (NYSE: PMI) today announced that Homeowner Reward Co., a PMI subsidiary, is launching an innovative new pilot program intended to support sustainable homeownership in certain hard-hit real estate markets.

Under the new program The PMI Group will offer cash incentives to some homeowners in negative equity to help prevent mortgage defaults.

Homeowner Reward Co. is working with Loan Value Group LLC to offer the RH Reward® to a group of homeowners whose mortgages are insured by PMI Mortgage Insurance Co. (PMI-MIC).

This unique program addresses a serious problem for many homeowners who find that factors outside their control – particularly lower home prices in their cities and neighborhoods – have left them owing more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth.

RH Reward seeks to address this problem through an incentive-based program that offers eligible homeowners a cash reward for staying current on their mortgages. There is no charge to borrowers to participate in the program.

"We are very pleased to have Homeowner Reward Co. offer this pilot rewards program as we continue to seek creative and effective loss mitigation strategies," said Chris Hovey, PMI-MIC’s SVP of Servicing Operations and Loss Management. "PMI is committed to supporting sustainable homeownership in all the communities it serves. The interests of PMI are uniquely aligned with those of homeowners.

PMI is especially supportive of homeownership retention efforts in states that are facing unprecedented housing challenges."

SOURCE: The PMI Group

Federal fees halted to 3 mortgage servicers

Three of the nation’s largest mortgage servicers will no longer receive payments tied to their participation in the Obama administration’s main foreclosure prevention initiative until they improve their performance in that program, a senior administration official said Wednesday.

[pullquote_right]Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo need to make “substantial improvements”[/pullquote_right]Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo need to make “substantial improvements” to collect fees through the Making Home Affordable Program, which helps struggling borrowers by lowering their monthly mortgage payments.

The companies failed to meet basic program requirements, such as properly contacting borrowers, the official said. The details are scheduled to be released Thursday in a report that will assess the performance of the 10 largest participating servicers.

Through the initiative, servicers can collect at least $1,000 for each loan they permanently modify. The payment is meant to entice servicers to participate in the voluntary program, which has doled out $560 million in payments since its launch in March 2009.

The three targeted servicers — which received $24 million in payments last month — will not receive payments for permanent modifications reported from June onward until they address their weaknesses.

No estimates are available yet for how much will be withheld.

A fourth servicer — Ocwen Loan Servicing — also ranked among the worst performers, but it will continue to receive payments because its poor showing was due primarily to a portfolio of loans it recently acquired from another company, the official said.

The move is the first major action taken against servicers participating in the embattled program, which has been criticized as ineffective and too soft on the servicers.

The House recently approved a Republican-led measure that would kill the initiative in part because of its lackluster results, but the measure has not gained traction in the Senate.

When the program was created, the administration projected it would prevent 3 million to 4 million foreclosures before it expired in December 2012. But it is expected to fall far short of its goal, having permanently modified only about 700,000 loans so far.

The Treasury Department, which oversees the program, does not regulate the institutions that participate and therefore cannot impose fines or penalties, said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the information has not been made public. The only available leverage is to withhold incentive payments, the official said.

Doing so is not likely to discourage lenders from modifying loans, the official said. Instead, the strategy and the in-depth analysis of each lender should shame servicers into shaping up.

“It’s a temporary withholding to get them to fix the problem,” the official said.

Borrowers and the investors who own mortgages also receive incentive payments for participating in the program. Their payments will not be withheld.

SOURCE: The Washington Post

Housing short sales may be targeted for fraud

Short sales may be targeted for fraud

A study estimates that banks and distressed home sellers will lose more than $375 million this year when they sell undervalued houses to tag teams consisting of realty agents and investors.

Are banks and distressed home sellers getting rooked on a massive scale in the booming short-sale arena — leaving hundreds of millions of dollars on the table for white-collar criminals?

[pullquote_right]Realty agents and investors who participate in these schemes risk prison terms of up to 30 years, big fines plus restitution of the funds they stole.[/pullquote_right]A comprehensive new study estimates that they will lose more than $375 million this year when they sell undervalued houses to tag teams consisting of realty agents and investors. Worse yet, the trend appears to be growing at the rate of 25% a year.

CoreLogic, a large real estate and mortgage data research firm in Santa Ana, studied 450,000 short-sale transactions across the country during the last two years and offered these examples of how lenders are losing big bucks:

• A house in Kings Beach, Calif., was purchased near the height of the boom in 2005 for $530,000. On Oct. 28, 2009, it was sold for $247,500 to an investment group in a short sale — an arrangement in which the lender allows the delinquent owner to avoid foreclosure by selling to a third party at a price lower than the loan balance. Later that same day, the investors resold the house to a non-investor purchaser for $375,000. This produced a quick $127,500 profit — a 52% gain for the investment group in a matter of hours.

• A house in Gilbert, Ariz., sold for $400,000 in 2006. On March 2, 2010, it was bought in a short sale by investors for $220,000 and resold the same day for $267,500 — a gain of $47,500.

How do investors manage to turn such quick profits? Are they just super-sharp shoppers or is there something else going on? Law enforcement and banking industry experts say it’s frequently fraud, and it works like this: Local real estate agents partner with investor groups. The agent’s job is to spot borrowers in financial distress — usually people who are underwater on their mortgages, meaning they owe more than their homes are worth. They persuade the homeowners to sell to investors in a short sale at a low price. Then they contact the bank with the investors’ short-sale offer.

Meanwhile, the agent finds legitimate buyers who are willing to pay more for the property, but the agent never presents their offers to the bank. To back up the investors’ lowball offer, the realty agent produces an appraisal or a “BPO” — a broker price opinion of the distressed home’s value that confirms the low valuation. The bank then sells to the investment group. After the closing, the investors sell the house to the legitimate purchasers at the higher price, and the realty agent and the investors split the profits.

According to the CoreLogic study, 65% of short sales that are resold within six months for profits of 40% or higher are “suspicious” — with a significant possibility the lender accepted a low payoff. Most of these transactions go undetected by the banks being defrauded, but some lead to prosecutions and convictions.

[pullquote_left]When distressed owners are pressured to sell to investor groups for less than the highest offer available, they can end up deeper in debt to the lender. In the majority of states where banks can pursue borrowers for mortgage balance deficiencies after foreclosure or short sale, homeowners may be subject to debt collection actions by banks.[/pullquote_left]For example, Connecticut real estate agents Anna McElaney and Sergio Natera are awaiting sentencing hearings in July and October in connection with guilty pleas in federal court to short-sale bank fraud. According to the U.S. attorney’s office in Connecticut, McElaney and Natera participated in a scheme in which Regions Bank, headquartered in Alabama, agreed to a $102,375 short sale on a house it financed in Bridgeport, Conn. The buyer was BOS Asset Management, an investment company controlled by Natera. Unknown to Regions Bank, however, listing agent McElaney had earlier received a signed purchase contract from a private buyer for $132,500. After closing at the lower price, BOS resold the property to the private buyer, yielding Natera and McElaney a fast $30,125 profit.

The original federal charges against the two agents alleged short-sale frauds on three other houses, including properties financed by Wells Fargo Bank and a mortgage unit of the global financial services firm Credit Suisse. The guilty pleas, however, solely involved the Regions Bank house in Bridgeport.

Though banks are the primary victims in short-sale scams, homeowners can be hurt as well. When distressed owners are pressured to sell to investor groups for less than the highest offer available, they can end up deeper in debt to the lender. In the majority of states where banks can pursue borrowers for mortgage balance deficiencies after foreclosure or short sale, homeowners may be subject to debt collection actions by banks. California does not permit lenders to demand payment of deficiencies from borrowers on mortgages used to acquire residences. However, refinancings may not be protected, according to legal experts.

But the bottom line here, as seen in the Connecticut guilty pleas, is that short-sale thievery is federal bank fraud. Realty agents and investors who participate in these schemes risk prison terms of up to 30 years, big fines plus restitution of the funds they stole.

SOURCE: Washington Post